|
Q & A Guidance
Q&A Guidance for Persons Considering
a
Global Health Career
International Health: Career Options & Specialization
Physicians-in-training considering a possible full- or part-time
career in international health (IH) often ask about career opportunities and the
need for postbasic training or specialization. This section, prepared for the
Global Health Education Consortium (GHEC), seeks to provide some help for
answering these questions.
First, a few important and obvious
principles:
|
Consider carefully your motivations for international health work.
There are many reasons for considering IH work. These include:
altruism towards disadvantaged peoples; faith-based service to others; the
opportunity to learn about and from diverse cultures; travel and adventure;
learning new skills; “escape” from perceived problems of the US; improving
language skills; and a search for ancestral roots. For most it will be a
combination of several reasons, with some more important than others. Many
students entered medical training motivated by a desire to help people and
certainly IH work will provide them ample opportunity to help those most in
need. Approximately 40% of the world’s population lives on less than $2/day and
20% on less than $1/day. To sense the power of comforting suffering and the joy
of making a small difference in the lives of the poor, consider reading books
such as, The City of Joy by Dominique LaPierre, and Mountains Beyond Mountains
by Tracy Kidder. Your own reasons for considering IH work will affect your
choices regarding type of work, type of sponsor, and the amount of time you will
want to spend in the field. These choices, in turn, will have important bearing
on your choice of specialty.
|
|
Do not consider a specialty just because it may be more useful in
finding a job in IH! Life is too short, you will have already spent
many years and much money obtaining your professional degree, and you don’t want
to spend additional time and money in a field that is not otherwise of much
interest to you.
|
|
Use your medical school undergraduate elective options to sample
specialties of potential interest. Spend some time with established
practitioners in these fields to learn about these fields of practice, their
benefits, limitations, and the market for qualified
specialists.
|
|
Consider the effect of foreign living on your lifetime career plans.
Living and working abroad has many life-enriching benefits for both you
and your family. Even if your time abroad is limited, it can help you become a
better doctor in whatever field you choose enter. However, there are some career
risks you should keep in mind. For potential future U.S.-based employers will
your time abroad be a plus or a minus as they evaluate your resume? Sadly,
unless you choose your position wisely, it could be more the latter than the
former. Some jobs in the U.S. will give you "credit" towards advancement for
your work overseas, eg, with some government, academic and consultant
organizations. For others, however, you may find that on return to the U.S. your
peers in the U.S. have advanced farther in their careers than you have. This may
not be a serious consideration for those with a strong commitment to IH and who
wish to have a lifetime IH career, but is something to think about. If your
preference is for just a few years of IH work, and if you want to reach the
highest level possible in your chosen career, think about the possible effect of
spending time away from the U.S. Will this absence enhance or hurt your
reputation and chances for advancement? Can you compensate for your absence
through professional publications or periodic returns to the U.S? Would the IH
experience more than compensate for a somewhat slower pace of advancement in
your primary career? Would it be better to do your IH work early, before your
career is well established and then return, or would it be preferable to become
well established and then, after your children have left home, to go
overseas?
|
Finally, and to state the obvious, you, and only you can decide
what is right for you. However, to help you narrow your range of choices we have
listed below frequently asked questions along with possible answers.
International Health Careers
~ A Q&A
Session with GHEC ~
• How important is the reputation of my postbasic
training institution? — The answer is somewhat different depending on
the type of organization you would like to work with. Major U.S. employers (eg,
universities, centers, institutes, consultative organizations) and multilateral
organization (eg, WHO, World Bank), will likely consider both the reputation of
your postbasic training institution and the relevance of your training program
to the job position for which you are being recruited. Faculty contacts you make
in these first rank institutions can also be very helpful in your search for a
job. Most other employers, eg, smaller NGOs, faith-based organizations, and
foreign employers will probably give little weight to your training institution.
Persons in most foreign countries are not too familiar with the relative
reputations of U.S. universities and residencies, and over the long run, your
own skills, personality, and performance will be much more important in
determining your success than where you received your postbasic training.
• Are short, non-degree or certification programs
available to help me prepare for international work? — Most definitely
yes! Numerous language immersion programs are available, especially in Spanish,
and short pre- and post-graduation courses are available to help prepare
physicians for clinical and other aspects of IH. The GHEC website
(<www.globalhealth-ec.org>) is a good place to start your search.
• What types of jobs are available in IH? —
There are many different options. Major options are listed below along with a
qualitative appreciation of the ease of getting a job and typical expectations
of prior training and experience. While the total number of health professionals
working in IH will likely increase substantially in the future, the increase in
jobs for physicians may increase more slowly. Many low income countries now have
a substantial medical workforce, there are relatively fewer opportunities for
American doctors to do clinical work (except in faith-based NGOs), and a high
proportion of the IH jobs call for persons with public health training, with or
without a medical degree. The more common fields of work include family
planning, maternal and child health, malaria, nutrition, TB and HIV/AIDS. While
it would appear that specialization in infectious disease would be an attractive
field to work in, adult ID is now mostly concerned with opportunistic infections
in the immuno-compromised patient. Pediatric ID can, however, can be more
relevant.
|
International, or multilateral organizations — Examples:
WHO, World Bank, UNICEF — These organizations usually require specialization
and prior work experience at a progressively responsible level; postgraduate
degree training in disciplines such as public health, business, economic,
development studies, and social or behavioral sciences is valuable; American
citizenship can be an asset for some jobs but may be a liability since these
organizations tend to have quotas and the "American" and "industrialized
country" slots are often filled. Salaries and benefits are among the best for IH
work, travel can be extensive, and a career with these organizations can be
rewarding, though at times frustrating due to bureaucracy and the inherent
problems of international assistance. Short-term consultations with the banks
can be lots of fun and they pay adequately; much of the short-term work with WHO
will be without honorarium or only with a nominal payment.
|
|
Bilateral, governmental organizations — Examples: USAID,
DHHS (through the Public Health Service and/or Centers for Disease Control, and
the Office of International Health), the Peace Corps, U.S. embassies abroad, and
various other national foreign assistance organizations — Job requirements are
similar though probably somewhat less demanding than in the case of the
international organizations. There will be more opportunities for internships
and entry-level positions, especially in the CDC, which offers training
(including fourth year U.S.-based electives) in both the U.S. and abroad.
Several years of training and service in the CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service
as an EIS officer would be an especially good way to enter international
government service while receiving excellent training in the process. A
preventive medicine residency, available at many public health training and
service institutions, is another good option. U.S. international aid
organizations have tended to contract out many of their activities so direct
hires are relatively few and are mainly determined by retirements rather than
agency growth. Career positions will have all the joys, relatively good
remuneration packages, and sorrows inherent in large agency
employment
|
|
Academic institutions — Examples: Schools of medicine,
nursing and public health — For those interested in academia this is a good
option since it provides a home base, opportunities for progression up the
academic ladder, and if the right departmental base is found, you can get
"credit" for your IH activities. Besides teaching, work options in academic
institutions will usually be field research, clinical or public health
activities, and/or short consultations abroad in your field of specialty. GHEC
has some 300 members from ~60 North and Central American medical schools, and
the GHEC website <www.globalhealth-ec.org> provides a good entry to this
resource as regards medical schools.
|
|
Not-for-profit non-governmental service organizations —
There are many such organizations that fall into several broad categories.
Specialized health services and/or training: Examples include many medical
specialty societies that hold short-term "service camps" for cataract surgery,
cleft palate repairs, orthopedic and rehabilitation services, etc., while at the
same time providing training to local health personnel. The American Academy of
Family Physicians and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene both
publish and maintain lists of overseas opportunities. Emergency relief and
rehabilitation: Organizations such as Doctors without Borders, International Red
Cross, CARE, etc., help with famines, refugee crises of the sort that occurred
in Rwanda, Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa region. Probably
non-physicians hold most permanent staff positions, while physicians do much of
the short-term work.
|
|
For- and not-for-profit consultant organizations —
Examples: Management Sciences for Health, John Snow, Inc., University Research
Corporation, Family Health International — Recent decades have seen a rapid
growth in the number, size and complexity of IH consultant organizations due to
the trend toward government contracting for the provision of IH assistance. Such
organizations often provide a good opportunity for new graduates, especially
those with public health skills, with or without medical training. Pay and
benefits are usually good, and there are opportunities both for long- and
short-term overseas assignments.
|
|
Faith-based organizations — Examples: Church World Service;
Aga Khan Foundation; Catholic charities; Project Hope; numerous denominational
charities and health facilities — Except for short-term assignments, most such
organizations will expect you to be a member of the sponsoring denomination.
Most jobs with faith-based organizations will be clinical or associated with
relief services, and usually offer a pay scale well below usual norms. Some
small organizations such as the American Friends Service Committee will have
positions for persons irrespective of denomination.
|
|
For-profit commercial organizations — Examples:
Pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies. — Many such companies market
their products and even conduct research in overseas locations. These jobs will
be among the best paid but in some cases may result in employees feeling
compromised by their need to maximize sales, even when company products are
ill-suited to the perceived main health needs of the
country.
|
• What do you want to do in IH? — Do you see
yourself primarily working as a "practitioner" or as a "change agent?"
Practitioners spend most of their time working one-on-one with patients, while
change agents work primarily to change the attitudes, behaviors and practices of
organizations or groups of individuals? In real life most persons working in IH
combine elements of both roles but where you are on the continuum between one
extreme and the other will have important implications for your postbasic
training program.
• At what stage in your working career do you want to do
your IH-related work? — Early in your career while you and your
children, if any, are young? Or later on, after you have become established in
your chosen field? Children in their teens are more difficult to move away from
friends and classmates, and their educational requirements are more demanding
and critical as regards application to college.
• Where do you want to spend most of your IH
time? — During your IH career do you primarily want to live overseas,
or primarily in the U.S., with short-term (weeks to several months) visits to
overseas locations?
• What type of postbasic training is most
appropriate? — This will depend on your preferred type of work.
Postbasic clinical training will be essential if your primary role is clinical
and/or in clinical research. If, however, you tend more toward working in a
change agent role, you may want to consider public health or perhaps other
non-clinical training, either in place of or in addition to, clinical training.
Either way, some international experience before you start postbasic training
will help you determine what type of training will be most relevant to your
future career. The two major paths, Clinical Training, and Public
Health or Other non-Clinical Training, are outlined below:
|
(1) Clinical Training
|
|
What clinical specialties are most appropriate for IH work?
— Anecdotal information suggests that most physicians working in IH are
specialized in one of the following fields: family medicine, pediatrics, OB/Gyn,
emergency medicine, internal medicine, public health (with many specialties
available in this field), and psychiatry/mental health. The fields of internal
medicine and pediatrics also offer subspecialization in infectious disease,
which can be very useful in some settings. We do not have quantitative
information on the distribution by specialty of those actually working in IH,
and in any event, this would vary widely depending on the type of work being
done. Among the clinical specialties family medicine and emergency medicine
offer certain advantages. In both fields you see all patients – young, old,
pregnant, medical and surgical – and thus you will have a clinical versatility
that is advantageous both overseas and in the U.S. For those considering short
IH assignments, emergency medicine has the advantage of a high degree of time
flexibility. Short-term assignments can readily be arranged with NGOs working on
refugee and humanitarian crisis situations and U.S. hospitals are always in need
of EM doctors or locums. Such arrangements are more difficult in those
specialties that emphasize continuity of patient care.
|
|
How important is it to have a clinical specialty? To be board
certified? — A clinical specialty, including family medicine, will
definitely be important if you plan to work primarily in a clinical role, and
will probably be essential if you plan to teach and/or return to the U.S. to
practice after your international work is complete. Though board certification
may not be essential for most non-academic international positions, it is very
desirable and indeed many potential employers are likely to give substantial
preference to those who are certified in a clinical
specialty.
|
|
Are there clinical residencies in IH? — Yes, though not a
large number. These may be accessed through the GHEC website. An especially
useful guide is the 326 pp. document, International Health Care
Opportunities in Family Medicine: A guide for practicing Family Physicians,
Family Practice Residents & Medical Students, published by the American
Academy of Family Physicians in 2000. The guide lists many programs, either
based overseas or with IH relevance. Though most residency time is actually
spent in the U.S., some supervised overseas time can be credited towards
completion of residency requirements. Additionally, these residencies usually
provide structured activities and offerings that will help residents prepare for
overseas work. The AAFP website also provides substantial information on
International Family Medicine (http://www.aafp.org/x13825.xml).
|
|
(2) Public Health or Other Non-Clinical
Training
|
|
Will a public health degree increase chances of employment?
— The answer is, of course, "it depends." It depends on what you want to do.
For persons engaged in short term IH assignments or who are working primarily as
clinicians, a public health degree adds little. However, for substantial IH
assignments and for a wide variety of jobs concerned with field research,
overseas training, and especially, in jobs concerned with program development,
implementation and evaluation, a public health degree can be valuable. The field
of concentration will have some bearing on your employability, but probably not
as much as the mere possession of a public health degree. This degree gives
evidence that you have had basic training in the core disciplines provided by
most schools of public health, viz, epidemiology, biostatistics, elements of
program planning and management, and one or more of the important programmatic
content areas such as maternal and child health, health education, and
environmental health. Many schools of public health offer the option of
completing a preventive medicine residency in conjunction with an academic
degree. This residency, by itself, will probably have limited relevance to the
most IH positions.
|
|
Which schools of public health offer IH programs? — At
least 10 of the 34 accredited schools now offer concentrations in IH, though the
programs vary widely in scope, content, and faculty strength. Probably the
oldest and largest formal program is in the Dept. of International Health at the
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health ( Baltimore, MD). With four
distinct IH tracks and more than 100 Masters and doctoral students in that
department alone, plus several other departments with substantial international
orientation, Johns Hopkins provides an exceptionally strong IH program. Other
strong programs, in alphabetical order, are at Boston University, Columbia,
Emory, Harvard, Tulane, Univ. of California (at Berkeley, and at Los Angeles),
Univ. of Michigan, Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Univ. of Washington,
and Yale. Full details can be obtained from their websites (see
www.globalhealth-ec.org and www.asph.org/) and catalogs. Most schools now offer
a one-year MPH program for those with a prior health degree as compared with
their usual two-year program for those coming directly out of college. While
this offers health professional graduates with a time and money advantage, it
greatly reduces the number of elective and second-level courses that can be
taken. Another consideration for those who graduate with a large indebtedness is
the cost differential between public and private schools, typically ~$15,000 vs.
~$30,000 per year. Two other training options are: the excellent two-year
“Epidemic Intelligence Service” program offered by the Centers for Disease
Control; and for those interested in training abroad, the world-renowned London
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine or a public health program in Canada or
France.
|
|
What areas of public health concentration are most relevant to
IH? — While the specific choice will, of course, depend largely on
your job preferences, some general observations may be
useful:
|
|
|
Maternal and child health . With more than 50% of developing
country populations constituted by reproductive age women and children, this is
obviously an important field. It is especially appropriate for pediatricians and
Ob/Gyn specialists. For those with a particular interest in women's issues,
reproductive health services are receiving increased
attention.
Population / family planning / demography.
Some schools combine these fields with MCH while others offer a distinct
program. Since many low income country populations are growing at a fast and
unsustainable rate, this specialty area is highly relevant to
IH.
Epidemiology, biostatistics, and/or communicable / tropical
disease. For those interested in research, academic work, or
involvement in programs concerned with infectious disease, this specialty can be
very useful. All schools offer courses in the disciplines of epidemiology and
biostatistics, and a few offer courses in communicable disease and tropical
medicine.
Public health administration, management and
policy. This broad and increasingly important area of concentration,
going under many names, is variously concerned with the program planning,
management, evaluation, economics and financing, and
policymaking.
Environmental health. Air, water, soil
and food contamination are very prevalent in developing countries so this field
has much relevance.
Occupational health and safety.
Developing country working conditions are often hazardous, and with the
increasing use of pesticides, toxic chemicals and industrial machinery, this
field is very relevant.
Nutrition. Malnutrition is a
major problem in developing countries and hence this discipline is highly
relevant. Most schools offer concentrations both in the laboratory research and
programmatic aspects of nutrition.
Health education /
promotion. Of necessity, most programs have a high educational
component so skills in education, the behavioral sciences, and medical
anthropology can be very useful.
|
|
|
When should I do my public health training? — Should PH
training be during medical school, immediately after graduation or during a year
taken mid-residency, or after the residency? There are advantages and
disadvantages to each but probably the easiest, if the option is available, is
to do your MPH degree concurrently with your medical training, perhaps after
your second or third year. An early MPH year has the several advantages: you are
still in the "student mode" and hence it may be psychologically easier to
continue with the usual student chores; the benefits of a PH orientation and PH
contacts will serve you in good stead as you complete your clinical training;
you are less likely to have spouse and child responsibilities to further
complicate your life; you won't have the potential risks of interrupting your
postgraduate clinical training, including that of obtaining a leave of absence
without penalty; and after completing your public health training you will
probably know better what type of IH work you would like to pursue, and hence
the most appropriate clinical or other specialization. On the other hand, if you
are not yet very sure about either IH as a career or the potential relevance of
PH training for what you want to do, a delay may be best. This way you minimize
the risk of spending a year of your life and accumulating more debt to get a
degree you may not find useful.
|
|
What about other types of non-clinical training — There
are significant and increasing numbers of health professionals working in IH who
have postbasic training, occasionally leading to a degree, in such fields as
law, economics, business, education, sociology, psychology, development studies,
and medical anthropology. Physicians with training in these other disciplines
can make an especially valuable contribution
|
• Consider when would be the best time to spend a few
years overseas? There are several aspects to this important question,
including especially those of children, career, and level of commitment to IH.
For children, the easiest time is when they are young or, of course, after they
have left home. When young, domestic help is abundant and inexpensive, young
children sop up languages like a sponge, peer norms and pressures are not as
important as in later years, and local school deficiencies will be less harmful
than later on. By the time your children reach the last 2-3 years of high school
you will need to think about possible adverse effects on their education if you
continue to remain in a country with a deficient school system. It will also be
much harder for them to leave their friends if they have been raised in the U.S.
and then are taken abroad during their teens. For careers, you will need to
consider your longer-term objectives as noted in a preceding section. Those
choosing to absent themselves from the U.S. for several years at a time while on
the track of a U.S.-based career not designed around IH may experience slower
career progression and/or difficulty finding a job on re-entry. By level of
commitment we refer to the importance you attach to IH work. If you have a
strong commitment and have already had enough IH experience while a student to
know what it is like, then your choice is easy; start working in IH as soon as
you can and don't worry about other considerations. If, however, you are unsure
about your degree of interest in IH, try it out soon after completing your
studies. After several years of IH work you will either be enthusiastic to the
point that you can then decide to plan a career that includes significant IH
work, or you will decide that additional IH work is not for you. If you remain
enthusiastic, success in your initial international experience will be a
powerful assist in getting your next international job because it shows that you
can really do it. And if on the contrary you decide that IH work is not for you,
your time commitment up to now will have been small, you were at the start of
your career, and your several-year delay will not prejudice further
advancement.
• Take into account the wishes of your spouse or
“significant other.” If you will not be alone in your IH work this is
a very important consideration! It is hardly necessary to stress that unless
both partners can find fulfillment in the special opportunities, challenges and
compromises of foreign living, the partnership will likely run into big trouble.
Given all the special problems you will encounter including language, cultural
differences, jobs, work permits, separation from friends and family,
communications, etc., you need to ensure that you and your partner are in
agreement about any potential foreign assignment. Living abroad can be
enormously fulfilling for a family, eg, closer bonding, warm friendships, less
outside distractions, foreign travel, etc., but the potential for stress is
there too. This can especially be the case in those countries where the gender
differential regarding jobs, authority, roles and expectations is much greater
than in the U.S. If both partners are not already somewhat experienced in
international living and equally committed to the experience, best you plan a
trial period of a few months or several years before deciding on an IH career.
One additional caution: There are lots of Americans working in IH who have
married persons native to the country in which they worked. Many such marriages
work out fine, but there are quite a few where in time problems arise due to
significant differences in the cultural and social upbringing of the spouses. An
American-born woman who marries a man from a culture in which male-female
expectations and opportunities are very different from those that exist in
America is at special risk. In time early cultural patterning can infuse their
way into the relationship such that the American wife finds herself constrained
by her husband’s expectations.
###
Prepared for the Global Health Education Consortium
by Thomas L. Hall
(with the help of GHEC colleagues), Inst. for Global Health
and Dept. of Epidemiology & Biostatistics,
Univ. of California at San
Francisco School of Medicine. 185 Berry St., Lobby 4, Suite 5700, San Francisco,
CA 94107 Tel: 415/731-7944; E-mail: thall@epi.ucsf.edu;
Corrections and
suggestions for improvement are welcome. File updated on 18 November 2005
|
|